On 15 July 2021, ESMA published a consultation paper proposing additions to its guidelines list concerning the delayed disclosure of inside information. These amendments aim to refine and clarify the circumstances under which issuers can delay disclosure.
Conditions for Delayed Disclosure
Issuers can delay disclosure of inside information when the following conditions are met:
- Legitimate Interest: Immediate disclosure will likely prejudice an issuer’s legitimate interest.
- No Misleading Effect: The delay is unlikely to mislead the public.
- Confidentiality Maintained: The issuer can ensure the confidentiality of the information.
The 2016 ESMA guidelines on these points are legally indicative and non-exhaustive, but they have functioned as a “safe haven” checklist for many issuers to determine when to delay disclosure.
Proposed Additions to the Guidelines
The 2021 consultation paper proposes two main additions to the list of legitimate interests under point (i):
- Redemptions, Reductions, and Repurchases: These activities involve own funds pending the supervisor’s authorization.
- Pillar 2 Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP) Decisions: This is a banking-specific requirement pending the supervisor’s decision. A separate section also outlines that Pillar 2 Capital Requirements (P2R) and Pillar 2 Capital Guidance (P2G) will likely constitute inside information.
Consultation Details
The consultation is open until 27 August 2021, and Logwise participates in the process. ESMA expects to publish a final report, including its amended MAR guidelines, by the end of 2021.
Recent ESMA Q&A Updates
On 8 August 2021, ESMA published a new version of its Q&A, which includes very few amendments, primarily related to the Credit Rating Agencies Regulation.
Next Steps and Context
In connection to the consultation, we refer to our related 2020 article, particularly the section titled “Next Steps,” as well as the ESMA implementing technical standards (ITS) on Insider Lists for SMEGM issuers. COVID-19 has caused substantial delays concerning anticipated MAR amendments and clarifications. Logwise is closely monitoring these developments to keep stakeholders informed.
Stay updated on ESMA guidelines—book a demo today to see how Logwise keeps you ahead.
FSMA vs Nyrstar: what the ruling means for delayed disclosure and insider lists
European market-abuse enforcement does not happen in isolation. Although MAR applies directly in every EU member state, day-to-day expectations are shaped by how regulators interpret and apply it in real cases. Court […]
FSMA vs Nyrstar: what the ruling means for delayed disclosure and insider lists
European market-abuse enforcement does not happen in isolation. Although MAR applies directly in every EU member state, day-to-day expectations are shaped by how regulators interpret and apply it in real cases. Court […]
The Essential Guide to Writing and Enforcing a Code of Conduct
Every successful organisation needs a strong code of conduct to set the tone for ethical behaviour and guide employees in their daily decisions. A well-crafted code of conduct isn’t just a document […]
Code of Conduct vs. Code of Ethics: What’s the Difference and Why It Matters
When organisations embark on creating policies for ethical conduct, two terms often emerge: code of conduct and code of ethics. These phrases are sometimes used interchangeably, which can cause confusion. In this […]
Conflict of Interest Explained: Types, Policies, and Real Examples
Learn how to identify and manage conflicts of interest using effective policies and compliance tools to prevent risk and ensure accountability.
