ESMA published a final report on 5 January 2022 concerning delayed disclosure under the Market Abuse Regulation (MAR). The translated guidelines were published on 13 April 2022. Each respective EU national competent authority has 2 months after that to comply and/or notify ESMA of any non-compliance.

The amendments primarily concern institutions subject to the EU Capital Requirements Directive (CRD) and/or the EU Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).

Key Amendments to the Guidelines Copied

The guidelines add two types of additional circumstances to the list of legitimate interests of issuers for delaying public disclosure of inside information under MAR Art. 17(4):

  1. Institutions intend to carry out redemptions, reductions, repurchases, repayments, or calls of their funds, pending regulatory authorization.
  2. Draft supervisory review and evaluation process (SREP) decisions or any related preliminary information.

Disclosure Requirements for Pillar 2 Capital Copied

ESMA clarifies that both Pillar 2 capital requirements (P2R) and Pillar 2 capital guidance (P2G) are highly likely to be price-sensitive, constituting MAR inside information and typically requiring disclosure. Issuing institutions must verify the fulfillment of the basic additional requirements of MAR Art. 7(1)(a), which defines inside information as:

  • Non-public information.
  • Directly relating to the institution that has received it.
  • Of precise nature.

General Observation Copied

A general observation is that only circumstance (1) above concerns most issuers, while the remaining items primarily relate to financial institutions.

Adapt to ESMA guidelines with ease—book a demo now to simplify delayed disclosure compliance with Logwise.

FSMA vs Nyrstar: what the ruling means for delayed disclosure and insider lists

FSMA vs Nyrstar: what the ruling means for delayed disclosure and insider lists

European market-abuse enforcement does not happen in isolation. Although MAR applies directly in every EU member state, day-to-day expectations are shaped by how regulators interpret and apply it in real cases. Court […]


Read more
FSMA vs Nyrstar: what the ruling means for delayed disclosure and insider lists

FSMA vs Nyrstar: what the ruling means for delayed disclosure and insider lists

European market-abuse enforcement does not happen in isolation. Although MAR applies directly in every EU member state, day-to-day expectations are shaped by how regulators interpret and apply it in real cases. Court […]


Read more
The Essential Guide to Writing and Enforcing a Code of Conduct

The Essential Guide to Writing and Enforcing a Code of Conduct

Every successful organisation needs a strong code of conduct to set the tone for ethical behaviour and guide employees in their daily decisions. A well-crafted code of conduct isn’t just a document […]


Read more
Code of Conduct vs. Code of Ethics: What’s the Difference and Why It Matters

Code of Conduct vs. Code of Ethics: What’s the Difference and Why It Matters

When organisations embark on creating policies for ethical conduct, two terms often emerge: code of conduct and code of ethics. These phrases are sometimes used interchangeably, which can cause confusion.  In this […]


Read more
Conflict of Interest Explained: Types, Policies, and Real Examples

Conflict of Interest Explained: Types, Policies, and Real Examples

Learn how to identify and manage conflicts of interest using effective policies and compliance tools to prevent risk and ensure accountability.


Read more
12316

Start Simplifying Compliance Today Copied