The integrity of financial markets relies on the mechanisms for controlling the flow of inside information. This article highlights 6 situations when MAR regulated entities may deviate from the general rule of immediate disclosure of inside information.
You may delay disclosure if all the following conditions are met:
If the immediate disclosure of inside information is considered to be damaging the issuer’s legitimate interests, the ESMA guidelines highlights a few examples where delayed disclosure of inside information may be allowed:
The company has developed a product or invention whereby the immediate disclosure of such information would likely jeopardize the company’s intellectual property rights (e.g. results of clinical trials of new drugs).
The company plans to buy or sell a larger holding in another company and the disclosure of such information would likely jeopardize the implementation of such plan.
The company participates in ongoing negotiations which results are likely to be jeopardized by immediate disclosure (e.g. mergers, acquisitions, splits and spin-offs, purchases or disposals of major assets or branches of corporate activity, restructurings and reorganizations).
The company’ s financial viability is in grave and imminent danger (although not within scope of applicable insolvency law) and, in addition, immediate disclosure of inside information would seriously prejudice the interests of existing and potential shareholders by jeopardizing the conclusion of negotiations designed to ensure the financial recovery of the company.
The inside information relates to decisions taken (or agreements concluded) by the company’s management body, which, according to national law or the Articles of Association, also need to be approved by another body of the company (principally a supervisory “Dual Board” pursuant to the German model) , other than the shareholders’ general meeting, in order to become effective, provided that:
(1) the immediate disclosure of this information before the definite decision is taken would jeopardize a proper assessment of the information by the public, and
(2) the company arranged for the definitive decision to be taken as soon as possible.
A transaction previously announced is subject to a public authority’s approval, and such approval is conditional upon additional requirements, where immediate disclosure of those requirements will likely affect the ability for the company to meet them and therefore prevent the final success of the deal or transaction.
Yes, the guidelines are not exhaustive and there are also various local regulatory adaptations. In e.g. Sweden a practice has been developed when it comes to creating insider lists ahead of financial reports, which is not based upon the explicit language of above exemplifying guidelines/cases.
Book your personal demo session today to learn more about Logwise and how you can save time and reduce MAR compliance risk. A demo session lasts for about 30 minutes and highlights the key benefits of using a digital insider list management service.
Discover the benefits of Logwise in your own time. We offer a 30-day no-obligations FREE trial period. Full support and training is included. Fill in the form and you will get access within 1-working day.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.